Japan’s share of the worlds exports . . .

Posted on 12th February 2013 by Trevor in Uncategorized

 

The degree to which yen depreciation affects global trade is not what it used to be when Japan had a 10+% share. Its export share is now about 40% of what it was in the mid-1990s and falling.

There is a strong academic case that countries with deflation and zero rates should be allowed to pursue a weaker currency openly as a policy tool. The reason is that there is no real conventional monetary tool they have left and if they are in a true liquidity/deflation trap, adding more domestic liquidity will not have much impact on real rates. The only way to get activity going may be to crowd in both exports and inflation via a weaker currency.

Yen Trap?

Posted on 8th February 2013 by Trevor in Uncategorized

Yen Trap click to read

Investment Advice: A Review

Posted on 6th February 2013 by Trevor in Uncategorized

http://bccjacumen.com/features/e-bulletin-exclusive/2013/02/investment-advice-a-review/

Financial advice. A perplexing subject. Let’s start with the negatives:

i)                    markets are inherently unpredictable, chaotic in the technical sense of the word, and we can’t know what the future will bring

ii)                  therefore financial planning  is a vexed endeavour with plenty of scope for error

iii)                there are not a few shysters out there peddling financial ‘advice’, lamentably with no further objective in view than their own self-interest.

To which we can rejoin:

i)                    it’s the nature of the beast

ii)                  not to make financial planning decisions is to make a financial planning decision. Normally this involves storing earned cash as cash. And  longer term, with government printing-press assistance, stored cash is the worst financial asset of them all

iii)                there are decent and competent advisers out there. It’s important to find one because even with a modicum of financial nous and the willingness to spend the time on research and analysis, most people are their own worst adviser. Personal planning decisions are more likely to suffer myopia and greed- and fear-induced blunders without third-party perspective and relative impartiality.

As an example of perspective, we could ask, at the present juncture, why is there so much pessimism out there as the world’s stock markets approach, or exceed their 2000 and/or 2007 highs? The fear perhaps that this rally will also fail? Most people know the problems have not gone away. A failure is probable as the rally has been bought with central bank money created out of thin air, and all the while, since 2009, stock market volumes have been declining —true bull markets are built on rising volume. But let’s look at the big picture, say 100 years, which shows:

  • a bull market from 1921 into 1929,
  • a massive bear market in which stocks did not recover their tone until 1949
  • a bull market into 1966
  • a sideways bear market (with inflation devaluing money by 75%) into 1982
  • a bull market into 2000
  • a roller-coaster bear market until the present.

 

The bear market is not yet over, but it will be, let’s guess sometime in the second half of this decade. No doubt, as the fiat-created money eventually makes its way out of the banking system, it will manifest itself as frisky and eventually galloping inflation.

Which scenario yields three important conclusions:

1)                  accumulate precious metals, patiently on dips over time

2)                  the bull market in bonds, initiated by Paul Volcker back in 1979, is just about over and for the foreseeable future first-world government bonds are guaranteed certificates of confiscation.

3)                  the way to handle stock markets is stylistic: either move to the sidelines and then to bear instruments, or grit your teeth and average your way through the oncoming decline, because no matter how far down markets go, the prospective recovery (and yes there is always a recovery) will magnify all those bargain-priced units you have purchased on the way down.


At the same time, perhaps you should ask yourself when did you last put your own financial situation through an objective review ? It’s true there are fewer advisers in Japan than there were in 2007 and 2008. The depletion is no bad thing as the ones no longer here are no longer here for substantive reasons.

Shyster-detecting questions you may ask in vetting a potential adviser:

i)                    Do they have an office inJapan? (i.e. not working from home/a coffee shop nor jetting in from Bangkok, Hong Kong or Labuan or Manila etc.)

ii)                  How long have they been in operation / in Japan, and how long is it since they last changed their name?

iii)                Are they Japan FSA regulated?

Finally, the consultation should be for free and with no obligation.

These are important considerations, especially now that recent currency moves have made the thoughtful application of a still strong but obviously declining Yen an urgent consideration.

By Chris Cleary and Trevor Reynolds from Banner Financial Services Japan. www.bannerjapan.com

TAX: Residents of Japan with assets held overseas worth over JPY50 million

Posted on 1st February 2013 by Trevor in Uncategorized

In 2013 there is an effort to ensure that the taxable income arising from overseas assets is correctly and fully disclosed. Residents of Japan with assets held overseas worth over JPY50 million will be required to file a report disclosing those assets to the tax authorities.   This new requirement is in addition to the “5 year rule” where all foreigners are taxable on their worldwide income after they have lived in Japan for 5 years.

Reporting requirement

By 15 March of each year a Japan-resident taxpayer who holds overseas assets with a fair market value of more than JPY50 million as of 31 December of the previous year will be required to file a return declaring those assets. The first report will be due in March 2014 for assets held at 31 December 2013.

The location of assets is to be determined using the regulations applicable to inheritance tax. The table below shows the location for commonly held assets.

 

Asset Location
Immovable   assets Physical   location of the asset
Cash   deposits Address of   the branch where deposits are held
Bonds/Shares Address of   the head office of the issuer

As a result the report will not only identify undeclared sources of foreign income, but could also be used in identifying overseas assets for inheritance tax purposes.

 Penalties for non-compliance

The penalties for non-compliance are similar to those for the share based remuneration requirements above. If a taxpayer fails to file the  report or deliberately files a false report, they a face a penalty of either a maximum of one year in prison or a maximum fine of JPY500,000. These penalties will apply to the second reporting period (for assets held at 31 December 2014) onwards.   In addition the usual penalty for non-disclosure of income will be increased by 5% to 15% in cases where the underlying asset is not disclosed in this report. If the asset is disclosed, the penalty is reduced to 5% of the income.

 

Summary

The information disclosed in this report will aid the tax authority not only in identifying overseas sources of income, but also in ensuring that inheritance estates straddling multiple jurisdictions are fully disclosed. This is another sign of the increasingly aggressive stance the tax authority is taking to cross-border inheritances.

Banner Japan is able to assist with the setup of  a variety of Japan tax compliant structures and solutions — call us today for a free consultation on what we can do to shield and grow your assets. Also it is always best to start planning early even if you assets are not quite yet at 50m.

These solutions and structures will also shield you from the “5 year rule” too – contact us now and we can have a discussion to minimize your Japan tax exposure.